Mises Quote

Clock

Hudson

Archive for Book Reviews

The Church has never allowed the Creed to be interfered with. It is fifteen hundred years since it was formulated, but every suggestion for its amendment, every logical criticism or attack on it, has been rejected. The Church has realized that anything and everything can be built up on a document of that sort, no matter how contradictory or irreconcilable with it. The faithful will swallow it whole, so long as logical reasoning is never allowed to be brought to bear on it.

Adolf Hitler, quoted in Hermann Rauschning, The Voice of Destruction (New York: Putnam, 1940), pp. 23940.

Craig Biddle writes: “Hitlers plans required that people have faith; thus, he had nothing but contempt for logic. And he was neither the first nor the last to feel this way. David Hume was as explicit about his hatred of reason as he was about his love for feelings. Just as he insisted that feelings are our only moral guides, so he insisted that ‘Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.’ What does that mean? Hume tells us: ‘It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger.’ “

So, it is the case that ideas have consequences and the critical issue in Biddle’s book, Loving Life is just that.. One must have a rational, fact-based, means of making morally significant choices in life. Sadly, the general mass of humanity has only perceived two options for moral decision-making: religious authority and social need. Both involve subjectivism, neither provide an adequate means for living ones life to the fullest nor can be relied upon.

I have just about finished the book, and what is clear is that Mr. Biddle writes with power and precision. Yet, the book is not as much an attack on mysticism as it is a referral to reality. The flaws of mysticism become rather self-evident as one progresses through the material. I would recommend this book as food for thought to anyone with an open mind, or anyone who wonders what it is that has ruined the Republican party…

Categories : Book Reviews
Comments (2)
Nov-08
21

Human Action

Posted by: Our View | Comments (0)

Economics does not allow any breaking up into special branches. It invariably deals with the interconnectedness of all phenomena of acting and economizing. All economic facts mutually condition one another. Each of the various economic problems must be dealt with in the frame of a comprehensive system assigning its due place and weight to every aspect of human wants and desires. All monographs remain fragmentary if not integrated into a systematic treatment of the whole body of social and economic relations.

To provide such a comprehensive analysis is the task of my book Human Action , a Treatise on Economics. It is the consummation of lifelong studies and investigations, the precipitate of half a century of experience. I saw the forces operating which could not but annihilate the high civilization and prosperity of Europe. In writing my book, I was hoping to contribute to the endeavors of our most eminent contemporaries to prevent this country from following the path which leads to the abyss.

So, what’s on your Christmas List?

Get Human Action!

Categories : Book Reviews, Economics
Comments (0)
Jun-08
17

The “logic” Of The Greenery

Posted by: bildanielson | Comments (0)

In the preface to Huber and Mill’s, The Bottomless Well they state the following:

“What lies at the bottom of the bottomless well isn’t oil, it’s logic. Fuels recede, demand grows, efficiency makes things worse, but logic ascends, and with the rise of logic we attain the impossible-infinite energy, perpetual motion, and the triumph of power. It will all run out but we will always find more. Some say this is not good for the planet, but that’s how it works, regardless. What we will forever seek, and forever find, is not energy but the logic of power.”

I think this is a powerful point that is profoundly the antithesis of the greenery crowd’s not-so-veiled premise. Our advancements as humans, our increases in living well and enjoying our time here on the planet, is directly proportional to the degree to which we use logic in our pursuit of more and more refined forms of energy… The more we use, the better we become at finding more and focusing it more effectively, ergo the better off we become in tangible, measurable, ways. And, not surprisingly, is fully consistent with capitalism, private property and individual rights…

For example, using hydrocarbons in lieu of carbohydrates is proper because of the logic of the energy equation. Building a SUV-grade superhighway uses 10 times less land, per mile, and per useful pound moved, than growing food to fuel a bicycle rider – plowing for carbohydrates adds more carbon to the air (if you’re concerned about that, which I am not) than mining for coal or drilling for oil, because a farm requires so much cleared land. Bottom line, an internal combustion engine is far superior to a human stomach insofar as producing power to move things from point A to point B, moreover it turns out to be a far better alternative if you happen to be concerned about CO2…but this runs counter to the greenery world’s reversal of the laws of causality. Therefore, they reject all of it out of hand… and we tend to fail in pointing out the flaw in their fundamental logic.

Now, this is not to say that efficiency is inherently bad – clearly, the above example demonstrates “efficiency” but not simply for the sake of efficiency, rather for the sake of power production. I am also not suggesting that exercise is futile – I happen to race mountain bikes and ride road bicycles not because I think I am saving the damn planet, but BECAUSE IT’S FUN AND IT IMPROVES MY PERSONAL FITNESS AND WELLBEING!

Fact is, efficiency can be a beautiful demonstration of ones mind-work, but it just isn’t going to reduce demand. Never has, never will. This too is an axiom that appears to be missing in all of the discussions – most notably among people and politicians who drive public opinion and, to one degree or another, those of us who argue against them – we almost always seem to leave this argument unused yet it is the most powerful of all!

Logic and reason show us plainly that efficiency leads to more consumption, and not less, therefore the plain wrapper of the greenery movement should be discarded out of hand. By entertaining these people and arguing on their side of the field does no one any good – in fact, their prescriptions make us all poorer, net. They get away with the noise of externalities arguments because we let them off the hook of the axiom that A is A, and the illogic of their premises.

It isn’t, in my view, a matter of creating equally as absurd contrarian arguments (pointing out absurdity by being absurd), but rather simply pointing out the logic of consumption and using power as proper to the advancement of man and his progeny. The best allocator of the resources we use to create power has always been and always will be market capitalism because it gives us accurate signals through its moral medium, money. Those signals are a direct result of cost accounting which cannot happen, by definition, in a socialist world. So, consume at will to the best of your economic ability and within the frame of your own rational self interest – the world depends on it!

May-08
07

Guess the location …

Posted by: Absolutely Anonymous | Comments (2)

bookshelf.jpg

Categories : Book Reviews, General
Comments (2)
May-08
01

Ron Paul #1

Posted by: In the Know | Comments (1)

Ron Paul’s loyal supporters helped him set campaign fundraising records and capture more delegates during his presidential run than some of his high-profile Republican rivals. They even managed to briefly shut down Nevada’s GOP convention earlier this month over a rules change controversy.

Now they’ve taken his latest book to the top of the Amazon.com bestseller list.

“The Revolution: A Manifesto”, released earlier this month, is currently No. 1 on the Web site’s list of top sellers, besting even Oprah’s latest Book Club selection.

“Despite a media blackout, this septuagenarian physician-turned-congressman sparked a movement that has attracted a legion of young, dedicated, enthusiastic supporters . . . a phenomenon that has amazed veteran political observers and made more than one political rival envious,” boasts the book’s product description, adding: “Candidates across America are already running as ‘Ron Paul Republicans.’”

See Story Here

Mar-08
31

10 Reasons to Vote No For the Library

Posted by: Our View | Comments (4)

1. Unelected group using citizens tax dollars to advertise to raise your taxes. Now that in itself should render a NO, no matter what the referendum.
2. Illegal wording in the Hudson referendum. The actual amount a home owner would be forced to fork over is over 4 times the amount stated.
3. The current library is adequate. It is not overly crowded and has plenty of free parking. The space could be utilized better.
4. Over 40% of the monthly adult circulation consists of DVD’s. Yes, move over Blockbuster and Mr. Movies! It would actually be cheaper for the library to provide a Blockbuster membership with the library card, but Doh!, it would take away 40% of the people who walk into the place to begin with.
5. If the Friends don’t come up with the stated donations that they say, guess who will pick up the tab. Does the tunnel to nowhere sound familiar?
6. The nature of libraries is changing. More and more simply don’t use libraries. There is a whole new world out on the internet. Look to the right, there are dozens of free online libraries.
7. Foreclosures and an uncertain economy are making the public weary of higher taxes. Aren’t we taxed enough?
8. Unrealistic budget proposal. How can a library 5 times the size run on an operating budget not much larger than the current one? It can’t. Your taxes would increase to make up their lowball estimate.
9. High brow bourgeoisie elitists who think they know better just rub me the wrong way.
10. There is no need to fix something that is not broken. Eliminating the non educational DVD’s would reduce circulation and any perceived need for more space.

Comments (4)
Jan-08
29

The Enemies of Capitalism (America)

Posted by: bildanielson | Comments (0)

The following list is not exhaustive but is, without a doubt, a list of the so-called intellectuals who are absolutely the enemies of America (and the notable writings they spewed). Principally because they are the enemies of the one and only truly moral social system of engaging with ones fellow man; Capitalism. To be an enemy of capitalism is to be an enemy of individual freedom and the vision, writings, and words of virtually every founding father of America. Make no mistake about it, if you hear ANY politician cite or refer to ANY one of these people it is a RED flag which must go up immediately.

Learn this list!

(1) Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital.
(2) John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money.
(3) Joan Robinson, The Economics of Imperfect Competition.
(4) Edward Chamberlin, Theory of Monopolistic Competition.
(5) Benjamin E. Lippencott, ed., On the Economic Theory of Socialism.
(6) John Kenneth Galbraith, The Affluent Society, The New Industrial State (2d ed.).
(7) Joseph P. McKenna, Aggregate Economic Analysis.
(8) Paul Samuelson and William Nordhaus (9), Economics. Note: This is the leading textbook case of the exposition of economic fallacies and anticapitalist doctrines.
(10) Dudley Dillard, Economic Development of the North Atlantic Community.

Categories : Book Reviews, Economics
Comments (0)
Jan-08
07

Kook Alert? Smear? You decide.

Posted by: Flashy | Comments (4)


Kook alert – it gets good at the very end with the New Republic’s hit punk.

Tucker Carlson asks the snot-nosed puke if he had any evidence Ron Paul ever publicly stated anything of the sort … er, ah, well, no.

For the record, all of this has surfaced before – it is not new. From what I have been able to gather, a staffer for Dr. Paul wrote the inflamatory passages during the period between Paul’s stints in the House of Reps in a newsletter he did not have daily control over … and Ron Paul has apologized for the newsletter’s occasional bizarre content. A more detailed account of this is available HERE (Freemarketnews). The Freemarketnews article is based on an interview done by S. C. Gwynne, a reporter for Texas Monthly Magazine. That article was a wide ranging interview with Dr. Paul, written in October of 2001 (flashy has obtained a copy of the full article). It does contain Ron Paul’s explanation of this matter and below is the relevant excerpt in context:

Read More→

Comments (4)
Oct-07
18

Isabel Paterson

Posted by: bildanielson | Comments (1)

Isabel Paterson

“The philanthropist, the politician, and the pimp are inevitably found in alliance because they have the same motives, they seek the same ends, to exist for, through, and by others. And the good people cannot be exonerated for supporting them. Neither can it be believed that the good people are wholly unaware of what actually happens. But when the good people do know, as they certainly do, that three million persons (at the least estimate) were starved to death in one year by the methods they approve, why do they still fraternize with the murderers and support the measures? Because they have been told that the lingering death of the three millions might ultimately benefit a greater number. The argument applies equally well to cannibalism.” (Excerpt from The God of The Machine, by Isabel Paterson)

Ms Paterson is featured today out at the Mises site (great read, highly recommended).

Seems the Mises folks are about 2 years behind OTBL!

Categories : About, Book Reviews, General
Comments (1)
Jul-07
03

Atlas at 50, Part 1.

Posted by: Flashy | Comments (0)

Atlas CoverAtlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand's greatest work of fiction and without a doubt one of the most influential novels of all time, turned 50 years old this year.  As a novel it is pretty darn good, but as a statement of philosophy it is simply unmatched – it literally shook the collectivist worldview. Atlas has metaphors galore (one keeps finding more over time) and the philosophical meaning of her message is simply timeless.  There is no doubt in my mind that this book should be required reading for every high school student in America. 

Of course there are those that simply do not have the intellectual ability to grasp the full meaning of what Ms Rand was telling all of us, but then there are many who do and still more who have taken the time to honestly assess her work in this epic novel.  Also, there are many for whom Ms Rand is a pariah and the mere uttering of her name brings a scoff of indignation.  Without exception, those who take that view fall into one of two groups; either they have not completely read Atlas (or any other Rand work), or they have read it but did so with their own philsophical blinders on  refusing to seriously contemplate her ideas fully. 

I have read, re-read, and studied Atlas Shrugged and did so objectively.  When I first ran into her works, I was neither a fan or even knowledgeable about her.  What made it special for me was how it dovetailed with what I was already seeing and perceiving in the world around me.  Moreover, it reflected and echoed much of what one of my professors' covered in my days in college.  That professor challenged the way I thought and perceived the world around me, Rand simply reinforced and validated many of those ideas through a mere novel.   Over time (several years), I read virtually everything she had published.  Once you are introduced to her mind and her philosophy you must see it through to its logical end, and that's the true challenge of Atlas.  In order to fully understand the novel, you have to dedicate yourself to fully understanding and entertaining the philosophy it subsumes – a tall order for anyone. 

Admittedly, there are some more obscure newsletters which I have yet to fully contemplate but by and large I now have a pretty firm grasp on Rand and her philosophy. It is anything but dull or simple or superficial – it goes to the heart of our country's founding principals and the philosophical basis of its founding.  In my view, Ayn Rand would have stood very tall in the presence of Jefferson, Paine, Henry, S. Adam and J. Adams.  They were men of the enlightenment, Rand was a woman of the enlightenment.  They conceived a country premised upon the sovereignty of the individual over any government, stating that it is man's pursuit of happiness which is inalienable. Rand conceived and wrote about the very same sovereignty and inalienability, and illustrated that Capitalism, not Collectivism, is the most moral basis for a country so conceived. 

In Parts to follow I will highlight parts of Atlas Shrugged, pieces of the intellectual puzzle which Rand laid out for us.  Some will have rather obvious messages, some will not.  Yours truly will try to apply her ideas to our current "world crisis."

As a parting quote and to start things off on the right foot, below is a quote from Part Two / Chapter II – The Aristocracy Of Pull:

"Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion—when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing—when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors—when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you—when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice—you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot."

Comments (0)

Dr. Danielson made a rare appearance recently. He came out of the woods, put his cleats aside for a moment, and agreed to an interview and authorized the following excerpt regarding Nancy Pelosi and President Bush. The discussion and interview were surrounding the new book by Dr’s Patrick and Danielson, The Price of Sin. More on that (and Dr. Patrick’s interview) later, but these juicy comments are worth posting…

N.Onimous: Dr. D, onto to recent events. What do you make of Nancy Pelosi and her recent comments about the stock market?

Danielson: “Statist interventionist’s of the Pelosi ilk are seriously misguided atavists who will stop at nothing in their attempts to extinguish those vestiges of laissez faire which have somehow managed to remain. . . .

“It’s not the thief in the night one needs to be concerned with, it’s the one at the other end of the gun in broad daylight to whom you “voluntarily” hand over your property, deluded into thinking you were patriotic to do so…or exercising good citizenship. That is who she is, who she strives to be, and you and I are squarely in her and her ilk’s bore sights.”

“We are so far removed from the vision of The Founders of this country that it makes me cringe just contemplating it…. we simply do not live in the America they envisioned, but few think of it in those terms.. Sad, very sad.”

“Pelosi is an intellectual barbarian who’s stock in trade is sanctioning of the victim.”

N.Onimous: I could not agree with you more, Dr. D. One last question, if I might?

Danielson: Of course, go ahead.

N. Onimous: Regarding the upcoming election for President.

Danielson: Yes?

N Onimous: In the book, The Price of Sin, you and Dr. Patrick are very critical of the Republican Party. Didn’t you work pretty hard to see Bush elected? Twice? Yet you essentially are telling people that he and the GOP have basically sold us all out aren’t you?

Danielson: N.O., thank you for asking this question. It’s an important one. Yes, I did help out in the campaigns in Western Wisconsin. I wrote many letters to editors around the state, and provided numerous “rough letters” to others for submission, as well as painting signs and working in the GOP HQ. However, I will quickly point out, there were many in the Hudson area that did far more than I in the effort. No doubt about it, I was an enthusiastic supporter of Bush in 2000 and in 2004. I helped out when I could both with my time and some money, but really just a bit player in a very well orchestrated and focused campaign, particularly 2004.

But onto your real question. Yes, I now take a very dim view of President Bush and, especially, the rank and file elected crop of Republicans. And I do so on several different fronts. Please keep in mind, this is tough for me personally – after all, my great great grandfather was a very active character in the founding of the Republican Party in Ripon. He and his wife, Ione, were friendly with the Lincoln’s and the Grant’s. He raised and led the First Wisconsin Cavalry and worked tirelessly, and at his own personal risk, to free Sherman Booth from prision. My family history in the GOP runs far and deep, especially here in Wisconsin. So, for me to withdraw support (money and time) from the GOP is a big deal personally. But withdraw it I have.

First, the war. I was a very enthusiastic supporter of actions against the Taliban – destruction and humiliation appeared to be our M.O., as it had to be. Then came Iraq and I, along with virtually every reader of this blog, supported the invasion on several levels including WMD, enforcement of numerous U.N. Security Council Resolutions, removal of a dispicable dictator, securing Iraq from becoming a breeding, staging or haven grounds for terrorists, and as a place of stability next door to both irrational regimes, such as Iran, on one side, and two other dictatorships, Saudi Arabia and Syria, which openly either support or tacitly tolerate radical islamic fundamentalism. On these matters I was and, generally, still am on board with the President. Where he has gone astray big time is that he has clearly handled the invasion as a sacrificial engagement for the benefit of the Iraqis. We Americans are now being asked to sacrifice, not for our security, but for someone elses shot at democracy. In my view, that is just wrong headed and misquided but that is the official stance of the President and the party now. Frankly, it is dangerous and will cause us untold grief in the future.

Domestically, the President has been an incredible disappointment. Worse than zero action on our southern border, tepid (at best) support for laissez faire economic policy, expansion of the argument in favor of federal intrusion into education (NCLB), and massive funding and the resultant expansion of government. All of this while the GOP had control of both houses – unacceptable and pathetic in my view. I am sorry, but Bush has turned out to be the biggest political disappointment for me, personally, in my lifetime. As one who subscribes to classical liberalism, I find him to be clearly a big part of the problem and his evangelical religiousity doesn’t help matters either but I will leave that discussion for another day.

As Dr. Patrick and I illustrate in POS, the GOP is in deep trouble because they have left behind not just a large segment of the former base but they have completely lost touch with the founding vision of America. That is, essentially, what has killed their chances for 2008. The candidates being put up currently are merely re-runs of the recent past – there is no candidate at this point who portrays himself as the champion of the “American Idea” as envisioned in our founding. Ironically, that is precisely what this country needs more than anything right now and there appears no candidate who has the full arsenal of the intellectual and practical weapons to deliver the message and a plan to return us to that vision.

N. Onimous: Well, thank you Dr. D! You have been gracious to entertain a few questions.

Danielson: You’re very welcome, and I suspect you will have a great interview with Dr. Patrick as well – he is a very bright fellow with some wonderful “noggin leakage”!

N.Onimous: I will be contacting him soon and I am really looking forward to the interchange.

Jun-07
01

The Price of Sin

Posted by: Henry Patrick | Comments (0)

Just in time for Father’s Day a newly released book which accurately describes the context of today’s political battles. Learn about the source of our rights and what Jefferson meant by those haunting words “The Pursuit of Happiness”.

The idea of capitalism did not dawn with Adam Smith but millenniums before his Wealth of Nations. The true nature of the free markets may surprise you.

How our country has evolved from a republic to a democracy and how is it we have naively lost our fear of government? Is government a cost for our sins?

This book is a great primer in libertarian thought and the bases from which political discussion begins. Available now online at Xlibris and coming soon to local bookstores.

Order it here: http://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore/bookdisplay.asp?bookid=38563 and read an excerpt!

Comments (0)

This is a Widget Section

This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Left"

This is a Widget Section

This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Middle"

This is a Widget Section

This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Right"