Dec-06
08
Hudson |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Left"
This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Middle"
This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "Feature Bottom Right"
Curt,
This is fascinating. Your link to the Forum Communications site includes this passage regarding the City of River Falls:
Now wait just a cotton pickin minute here, no other government employees? No government K-12 school workers in River Falls, no county workers, no city employees?
Just what percentage of the employees in the River Falls area are government workers of one sort or another?
“Forum Communications” is an incongruent tag, vis-a-vis reality; Forum is defined several ways including: “A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.”
Communications is similarly defined in numerous ways including: “Any of various professions involved with the transmission of information, such as advertising, broadcasting, or journalism.”
So, by any objective standard Forum Communications should be about publications that principally promote open discussion – does anyone out there really think this is the nature of either the Hudson Star Observer, the River Falls Journal, or the highly controversial New Richmond News?
Oxymoron it is not, incongruent with reality – you be the judge.
Did you notice that when Doug Stohlberg is out sick, assistant editor Randy “no bias here” Hanson stacks the editorial page with pro-referendum letters (24 strong yes, and 5 very mild no letters). I have heard from others that their letters were also not published, yet there is no notice of “too many letters to print” on the editorial page.
I don’t mean to argue with you Curt, but I doubt that your letter made it as far as Steve Dzubay. Randy was in charge this week and worked it for all that he was worth. I wonder if he “promoted” Meg for the week so she could get a taste of that power?