<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the side of the people  &#8211; NOT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ontheborderline.net/on-the-side-of-the-people-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ontheborderline.net/on-the-side-of-the-people-not/</link>
	<description>Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito. Defending the constitution from government intrusion where ever it may be lurking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:01:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: On the BorderLine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scooping the Times&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ontheborderline.net/on-the-side-of-the-people-not/comment-page-1/#comment-4578</link>
		<dc:creator>On the BorderLine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scooping the Times&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontheborderline.net/?p=2710#comment-4578</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#039;ve had the same experience as Pejman in this matter. Apparently, the NY Times is doing a counter attack on behalf of the unions I spoke about in my prior post earlier today. They are going to try and discredit bloggers who are supporting Walmart. What I find extremely interesting, is that the exact same tactic used by this reporter is the tactic that he will be attacking in tomorrows NY Times article. This is extremely hypocritical. This is why I rarely read the NY Times. They are going to attack people for the exact same things that is a part of their business practice. The Times would have you believe that they never get any tips or leads from anyone. They would also like you to believe there is no political motive for their stories either. Look for the attack tomorrow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve had the same experience as Pejman in this matter. Apparently, the NY Times is doing a counter attack on behalf of the unions I spoke about in my prior post earlier today. They are going to try and discredit bloggers who are supporting Walmart. What I find extremely interesting, is that the exact same tactic used by this reporter is the tactic that he will be attacking in tomorrows NY Times article. This is extremely hypocritical. This is why I rarely read the NY Times. They are going to attack people for the exact same things that is a part of their business practice. The Times would have you believe that they never get any tips or leads from anyone. They would also like you to believe there is no political motive for their stories either. Look for the attack tomorrow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

